This isn't 1999.

Phrack

Just something I found that I thought I'd share.

Zoom in on the third screenshot on the right-hand side.

**MxO-Insertion**

Told you so.

/discuss.

**PBlade**

...Guess we're gonna look the other way on that one, huh?

SMILEY

Havocide

Hah never would have noticed it.

**Foxxdie** · 12/12/2007 08:21:15

Ex-FREAKING-Zactly.

There's also, oh I don't know, this shot from the actual first movie:

It's not always 1999.

**Yasamuu**

All I see is 1999..

>_>

<_<

Honestly!

**RetroX**

o ...rarebit is pwnt again
??

**Procurator**

I really, really, really want it to not be 1999 all the time. That's the worst thought out concept ever. The Matrix only consisting of a city and mountain range was bad enough, but a constantly looping year? Hate, hate, hate... If the W Siblings really did think of that, they don't deserve to produce movies anymore.

**Lezel**

niice...

/explanation

*waits patiently*

\m/><\m/

**Croesis**

The Machines were just trying to squeeze some more life out of their systems in case the millenium bug started off early.....

Phrack

Since I posted this, I've been asked on Xfire what I'm on about. Maybe this will help clarify my point.

**Harpalos-mxo**

It never made sense anyway.

Next MxO canon weirdness to clarify: the Matrix is only Megacity and everywhere else on the planet is a big blur.

**Vesuveus**

2007 in The Matrix, closer to 2207 in the Real.

**MxO-PhanthomZtryker**

Vesuveus wrote:

2007 in The Matrix, closer to 2207 in the Real.

Don't you mean 3007?
I think he said 1999 was 2999.

**SolidRevolver**

Beyond is probably one of my favs too... and that truck that pulls up to 'cleanse' the building, it looks very futurist for 2003... if it is indeed 2003, it may be 3003! O_O