Zudrag wrote:A CSR just kind of gave Ballak the $info to restart the box.Yeah because that helps...Lol
A CSR just kind of gave Ballak the $info to restart the box.Yeah because that helps...
No offence intended but I cant see the box being activated in the first screenshot Ballak.
Vinia wrote:No offence intended but I cant see the box being activated in the first screenshot Ballak.We're all buffed up to /dance, sorry. I forgot to mention that part.
Vinia wrote:Ballak wrote:Vinia wrote:No offence intended but I cant see the box being activated in the first screenshot Ballak.We're all buffed up to /dance, sorry. I forgot to mention that part.Even so, doesn't change the fact that the box is not shown as being activated in the first screenshot.Hey screw you.
Ballak wrote:Vinia wrote:No offence intended but I cant see the box being activated in the first screenshot Ballak.We're all buffed up to /dance, sorry. I forgot to mention that part.Even so, doesn't change the fact that the box is not shown as being activated in the first screenshot.
Zudrag wrote:Vinia wrote:Ballak wrote:Vinia wrote:No offence intended but I cant see the box being activated in the first screenshot Ballak.We're all buffed up to /dance, sorry. I forgot to mention that part.Even so, doesn't change the fact that the box is not shown as being activated in the first screenshot.Hey screw you.Whatever, just saying what I see.
Yeah, but you're questioning the authenticity of the screenshot, like we just played with our *CENSOREDS* for 2 hours and 56 minutes. Total fabrications, of course. You can't just write it off with the "no offence" phrase.
Ballak wrote:Yeah, but you're questioning the authenticity of the screenshot, like we just played with our *CENSOREDS* for 2 hours and 56 minutes. Total fabrications, of course. You can't just write it off with the "no offence" phrase.I have not stated that I don't believe you but from a dispassionate point of view probably taken by the CSR, if that was the screenshot submitted, then I can see why he only gave an amount of $i to cover the cost of the box.
Vinia wrote:Ballak wrote:Yeah, but you're questioning the authenticity of the screenshot, like we just played with our *CENSOREDS* for 2 hours and 56 minutes. Total fabrications, of course. You can't just write it off with the "no offence" phrase.I have not stated that I don't believe you but from a dispassionate point of view probably taken by the CSR, if that was the screenshot submitted, then I can see why he only gave an amount of $i to cover the cost of the box.I can't post the CCR from the CSR, but let's just say he had no idea what he was talking about. Is it really that hard to believe? Do I need a CSR to just sit by us the next time we do a *CENSORED* Diaymo? I mean, this is ludicrous. For the most difficult thing in the entire game, to just get gipped after 3 hours of straight fighting, anyone should have the right to be pissed.
Ballak wrote:Vinia wrote:Ballak wrote:Yeah, but you're questioning the authenticity of the screenshot, like we just played with our *CENSOREDS* for 2 hours and 56 minutes. Total fabrications, of course. You can't just write it off with the "no offence" phrase.I have not stated that I don't believe you but from a dispassionate point of view probably taken by the CSR, if that was the screenshot submitted, then I can see why he only gave an amount of $i to cover the cost of the box.I can't post the CCR from the CSR, but let's just say he had no idea what he was talking about. Is it really that hard to believe? Do I need a CSR to just sit by us the next time we do a *CENSORED* Diaymo? I mean, this is ludicrous. For the most difficult thing in the entire game, to just get gipped after 3 hours of straight fighting, anyone should have the right to be pissed.I understand that, but having a go at me for merely pointing out that I couldn't even see the box being activated in the first screenshot posted, (I assume that you have more screenshots anyway) does nothing. But then you've been at me during this whole thread for a reason I can't fathom.
Me? Have a go at you? Why would you ever think I would get at someone over the internet?
Ballak wrote:Me? Have a go at you? Why would you ever think I would get at someone over the internet?Well I can understand that you're annoyed right now, but before your attempt, I have no idea why.
I think you do, you just don't want to admit it. Welcome to the Internet.
And for something more on topic, when can we expect a fix for the 91 minute box times?