I don't understand why most/all aikido abilities have more acc boost than karate, when aikido has already a defence bonus, while karate has defence downgrade and they both have same accuracy but karate deals more damage.
I have done this many times.
Hit Damage Defense
Kung fu/speed +hi +low minus
Karate/power (?)minus +hi +low
Aikido/grab +low minus +hi
That is from memory. As I recall the styles and the tactics used the same template. But I think Karate has +low acc as opposed to minus - which it should have according to the table above.
That would explain the difference in ct bonuses were it the case.
I have done this many times. Hit Damage DefenseKung fu +hi +low +lowKarate +low +hi minusAikido +low minus +hi That is from memory. As I recall the styles and the tactics used the same template. But I think Karate has +low acc as opposed to minus - which it should have according to the table above. That would explain the difference in ct bonuses were it the case.
Kung fu +hi +low +low
Karate +low +hi minus
Aikido +low minus +hi
They are not balanced as the tactics. That is why it makes less sense. Not to mention the 2 unbalanced abs that karate has i.e. useless with fixes pproposed at the same time the aikido boosts were but still with nothing happening...
What I would really like is to see meanigful rolls - so I could then ascertain how relevant these CT bonuses are. Old school was 200 + CT bonus + roll (1-50)
Pretty important.
Now I do not know.