Station.com
Sign In Join Free Why Join?
Sony Online Entertainment
Community Store My Account Help
  Search   |   Recent Topics   |   Member Listing   |   Back to home page
CQ Point Leaderboard 'Pilot Program v1.0'
Search inside this topic:
The Matrix Online » Top » Gameplay Discussion » Player Versus Player Previous Topic  |  Next Topic      Go to Page: Previous  1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6  Next
Author Message


Jacked Out

Joined: Dec 15, 2005
Messages: 1100
Location: Syntax Server Faction: Winter Brood Organization: EPN Neurokinetic Level: 50
Offline

It is an ability included in the game for a reason.  I find it sad when people choose not to play with a full deck.

 


Jacked Out

Joined: Jun 1, 2006
Messages: 2689
Location: Guiness Lake
Offline

personlll wrote:
It is an ability included in the game for a reason.  I find it sad when people choose not to play with a full deck.

 
I think the point is that the system you suggested wouldn't necessarily reward skill either as it could just be someone picking people off all day then hyper-jumping away so as not to die.


Femme Fatale

Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Messages: 441
Offline

Tenshi wrote:
personlll wrote:
It is an ability included in the game for a reason.  I find it sad when people choose not to play with a full deck.

 
I think the point is that the system you suggested wouldn't necessarily reward skill either as it could just be someone picking people off all day then hyper-jumping away so as not to die.


Shouldn't you then be focussing more about stopping him from jumping so as to kill him then, rather than him "outwitting" your pvp skills by jumping away...

Anyway, coming back onto topic, I think it would be a cool idea to run this, as I know how much time many people put into being good at the whole pvp thing. Yes, the CQ system has never been perfect, yet it's what we've got so surely it'd be better to use it to its fullest.


Message edited by TheUnknownShadow on 05/08/2008 09:48:50.


Systemic Anomaly

Joined: Oct 10, 2005
Messages: 2461
Location: SyntaxXx
Offline

It's good to see we can use our CQ points to something.....out here in the forum.




Vindicator

Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Messages: 1445
Location: Syntax Faction:Exploits-Cyph Org:Machine
Offline

Marias wrote:
I'd like a top 20 or at least a highest earner per month/year.

This can be easily exploited.



Vindicator

Joined: Sep 1, 2005
Messages: 2466
Offline

Endomorph wrote:
Marias wrote:
I'd like a top 20 or at least a highest earner per month/year.

This can be easily exploited.
The entire system is exploitable. Not just this aspect in particular.



Code Breaker

Joined: Jan 9, 2006
Messages: 1319
Location: The Source Faction: My Own Organization: None
Offline

Marias wrote:
Endomorph wrote:
Marias wrote:
I'd like a top 20 or at least a highest earner per month/year.

This can be easily exploited.
The entire system is exploitable. Not just this aspect in particular.
And in there lays the difficulty of it all.



Systemic Anomaly

Joined: Aug 16, 2005
Messages: 1922
Location: Les Enfants Terribles
Offline

i suggest we switch to the ancient system of Man Points.



Systemic Anomaly

Joined: Oct 10, 2005
Messages: 2461
Location: SyntaxXx
Offline

9mmFU, so what are you working on with the Cq points if anything at all?

Can we see a update in the future where CQ points will count for something?

 




Vindicator

Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Messages: 1445
Location: Syntax Faction:Exploits-Cyph Org:Machine
Offline

Null




Vindicator

Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Messages: 3484
Offline

The only leaderboard type system that would ever matter would require an individual ranking value for every single player to be calculated not based on how many kills, but on quality of kills.  Defeating another player would tell the system that you are better than them and you could possibly advance.  Continually beating the same person would not advance your ranking, but would help to make the system more certain of the previous evaluation.  It would encourage people to hunt new targets.

It would be nice and all, but it won't ever happen.  I just hold out hope that bugs with cq can be fixed, and that eventually they will have some substance of meaning. 



Jacked Out

Joined: Sep 5, 2005
Messages: 1119
Location: Vectah!
Offline

SolidRevolver wrote:

Alternatively, we could kick the Sony Web Team into action as they have all the information required to make this from Rarebit.

If you still want to do it yourself, I think it would be a million times easier to ask Rarebit to give you a new one of these every time you wanted to update:

And I do respect the dedication you have for the game when your willing to do this, but for £10 a month, I actually think SOE should be doing all this stuff, especially when things like this basics to free MMOs SMILEY<img src=" width="15" height="15">


Updated!

 


Message edited by SajghO on 05/12/2008 20:56:07.


Vindicator

Joined: Aug 20, 2005
Messages: 3065
Location: Upstate NY
Online

My entry for this month...

 

That's right, this thread is not created by a PvPer, just someone with some initiative.




Vindicator

Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Messages: 1445
Location: Syntax Faction:Exploits-Cyph Org:Machine
Offline

Vesuveus wrote:

My entry for this month...

 

That's right, this thread is not created by a PvPer, just someone with some initiative.

You should take the Raw results from that table to fill the blanks and possibly contact those players ingame Via mail.



Femme Fatale

Joined: Oct 27, 2007
Messages: 1223
Offline

No point in not participating...


 
The Matrix Online » Top » Gameplay Discussion » Player Versus Player Go to Page: Previous  1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6  Next
Go to:   

Version 2.2.7.43