Has there been any update on the webpage showing the CQ counts you mentioned you were coding before rare...
Aquatium. wrote: Has there been any update on the webpage showing the CQ counts you mentioned you were coding before rare... Oh, I don't code. I did get the spec for it written up and sent off to Walrus, though. We'll have to see if we can get the web team to bite.
Rarebit wrote:Aquatium. wrote: Has there been any update on the webpage showing the CQ counts you mentioned you were coding before rare... Oh, I don't code. ;) I did get the spec for it written up and sent off to Walrus, though. We'll have to see if we can get the web team to bite. Anything we can do to help them bite? ^_^
Aquatium. wrote: Has there been any update on the webpage showing the CQ counts you mentioned you were coding before rare... Oh, I don't code. ;) I did get the spec for it written up and sent off to Walrus, though. We'll have to see if we can get the web team to bite.
I see what you did there...
So, is the Seasonal Celebrational Holiday going to be a little more... hostile this year, alike Halloween, or just as layed back as last years. Speaking of which, I hope the snowball system has been improved... I remember wishing the side-jumps and rolls would actually have had an affect on the *CENSORED* things hitting.
Dagonet wrote:Rarebit wrote:Aquatium. wrote: Has there been any update on the webpage showing the CQ counts you mentioned you were coding before rare... Oh, I don't code. I did get the spec for it written up and sent off to Walrus, though. We'll have to see if we can get the web team to bite. Anything we can do to help them bite? ^_^ Not as far as I know. I guess it's up to whatever strings Walrus can pull, and maybe...waffles?
Rarebit wrote:Aquatium. wrote: Has there been any update on the webpage showing the CQ counts you mentioned you were coding before rare... Oh, I don't code. I did get the spec for it written up and sent off to Walrus, though. We'll have to see if we can get the web team to bite. Anything we can do to help them bite? ^_^
CLAUDIUS, you should then have an empty slot with whatever server you had that 3rd character with. Is that not the case in your instance?
EDIT: Oh man, it's snowing in Seattle in November. This is messed up.
Dagonet wrote:Rarebit wrote:Aquatium. wrote: Has there been any update on the webpage showing the CQ counts you mentioned you were coding before rare...Oh, I don't code. I did get the spec for it written up and sent off to Walrus, though. We'll have to see if we can get the web team to bite.Anything we can do to help them bite? ^_^ Not as far as I know. I guess it's up to whatever strings Walrus can pull, and maybe...waffles?
Rarebit wrote:Aquatium. wrote: Has there been any update on the webpage showing the CQ counts you mentioned you were coding before rare...Oh, I don't code. I did get the spec for it written up and sent off to Walrus, though. We'll have to see if we can get the web team to bite.Anything we can do to help them bite? ^_^
Aquatium. wrote: Has there been any update on the webpage showing the CQ counts you mentioned you were coding before rare...Oh, I don't code. I did get the spec for it written up and sent off to Walrus, though. We'll have to see if we can get the web team to bite.
Quick, everyone start mailing waffles to the Seattle office!
God the online CQ leader board will be a sweeeeet addition.
Now if only CQs meant something gameplay wise...
Often times in mission areas I'll see a picture frame with some random picture of a person or persons. Are those pictures of real people like the designers who put them in or something different?
