What's your theory on what happened to Neo/Smith at the end of Revolutions?
Hmm lets debate this...
Well in order for me to determine if I agree with your or not you would have to go into more detail about this "design"... by who?
Smith is not a problem until there is Neo, so you would have to explain why the answer to the problem creates the problem in the first place. Why go through the motion? How do you start from the negative ie how do you start with -7 if you have not established |7|
There is another thread here:
http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/..._id=36300001496
The films, animatrix, & comics lead me to believe that Neo(by being host of this program or 'code' is Hybrid. There is no other justification that I have found, that have answers for those 3 questions. Bane, obviously his negative version in the real, shows proof that a program can use a human body as a host or 'mere vessel'.
If he is the "eventuality of the anomaly" and not it itself, I will need further explanation all of Neo's dealings with the Oracle. Oracle - "I'm sorry kid. You got the gift, but you're waiting for something. Another life maybe, who knows." The Oracle beleived he was the anomaly, how are/would you construe her actions taken and things said to fulfill your theory?
meaning that his existence is due to the existence of the anomaly, but separate from it.
Rarebit wrote: meaning that his existence is due to the existence of the anomaly, but separate from it. In terms of "powers outside the matrix" is carrying the code a human quality? Johnny Mnemonic like maybe, but in a debate of semantics it would be like saying fighting over Jesus vs. God. I call it Hybrid (for lack of a better term)... you call it?
In time travels you know not such things as spoilers
Architect: Your life is the sum of a remainder of an unbalanced equation inherent to the programming of the Matrix. You are the eventuality of an anomaly, which, despite my sincerest efforts, I have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a harmony of mathematical precision.
eventuality