[10.1.4] The Cypherites were definitely involved with Halborn - Vector - 4/24/08

**Niobe**

... Of course I'm glad we got him to New Zion. What the hell kind of question is that?

**nubious81** · 04/28/2008 20:00:32

wich brings us to the question What is the cyphs and halborn working on now?

**HutchieJNR** · 04/28/2008 21:00:35

Niobe wrote:

Best pic?

**Gerik**

HutchieJNR wrote:

Niobe wrote:

Best pic?

I've seen better, but not many. Thank you.

**HutchieJNR**

Out Of this thread I ment.

Was a good event.

**nubious81**

it was a pretty good event (( I dunno if this was supose to be lock the bulidn cause it got pretty chaotic with Cyph npcs Cypherites and mervs hoped in as well )) anyway and with todays event id like to see what this turns out to

**HutchieJNR**

nubious81 wrote:

it was a pretty good event (( I dunno if this was supose to be lock the bulidn cause it got pretty chaotic with Cyph npcs Cypherites and mervs hoped in as well )) anyway and with todays event id like to see what this turns out to

Was only Project Mayhem, Cryptos and CYPH npcs, But we only found out cos one of us were hardline hopping lol.

Would of Thought RR would've been told before hand if Cryptos was on.

**TonyJaa**

((Nice little event))

**Omega0**

HutchieJNR wrote:

nubious81 wrote:
it was a pretty good event (( I dunno if this was supose to be lock the bulidn cause it got pretty chaotic with Cyph npcs Cypherites and mervs hoped in as well )) anyway and with todays event id like to see what this turns out to
Was only Project Mayhem, Cryptos and CYPH npcs, But we only found out cos one of us were hardline hopping lol.

Would of Thought RR would've been told before hand if Cryptos was on.

Wow, another person making this grammar mistake, and then getting it right on the next try, all in the same sentence. At least be consistent!

**Procurator**

(( Whuh? Again?! And I didn't notice it this time. SMILEY

So yeah, for future reference to anyone who's bothered, the correct grammatical construct is would've, shortened from 'would have'. 'Would of' has no meaning. SMILEY

))