Yasamuu wrote:You don't know that it can be exploited 100% at all. You're speculating that it can. Unless you yourself have physically activated a hyper twice then you're just speculating that it can be done. If it can be done, /bug it but I doubt it can be.And 2v1's are not impossible to win either. so if there not impossiable why are people crying about i? i know it can be done and i have proof and buged it, but there will always be exploits dosent matter what you do, there will always be a way to cheatthats life get over it.
You don't know that it can be exploited 100% at all. You're speculating that it can. Unless you yourself have physically activated a hyper twice then you're just speculating that it can be done. If it can be done, /bug it but I doubt it can be.And 2v1's are not impossible to win either.
so if there not impossiable why are people crying about i? i know it can be done and i have proof and buged it, but there will always be exploits dosent matter what you do, there will always be a way to cheat
thats life get over it.
If I want to kill alot of people, I'll just restat to MKT. I kill about 2-3 times more people that way. But it gets boring, 'cause it's too easy.In any case: There are only a few unbalances left in PvP imo: Patcher Heal screwup and Throw Defense screwup. Everything else is more or less minor stuff.
Vosiler wrote:Yasamuu wrote:You don't know that it can be exploited 100% at all. You're speculating that it can. Unless you yourself have physically activated a hyper twice then you're just speculating that it can be done. If it can be done, /bug it but I doubt it can be.And 2v1's are not impossible to win either. so if there not impossiable why are people crying about i? i know it can be done and i have proof and buged it, but there will always be exploits dosent matter what you do, there will always be a way to cheatthats life get over it.Uh. What have I to get over? You're the one complaining about exploiting. Not me. I think I just stated, there will always be people out to try and exploit but we shouldn't be punished for them wanting to do that. The point I'm making is that Interlock classes are absolutely pointless in a zerg situation and they need to be able to have a tool to have SOME impact on the PvP.
Vosiler wrote:Yasamuu wrote:You don't know that it can be exploited 100% at all. You're speculating that it can. Unless you yourself have physically activated a hyper twice then you're just speculating that it can be done. If it can be done, /bug it but I doubt it can be.And 2v1's are not impossible to win either. so if there not impossiable why are people crying about i? i know it can be done and i have proof and buged it, but there will always be exploits dosent matter what you do, there will always be a way to cheatthats life get over it.Uh. What have I to get over? You're the one complaining about exploiting. Not me. I think I just stated, there will always be people out to try and exploit but we shouldn't be punished for them wanting to do that. The point I'm making is that Interlock classes are absolutely pointless in a zerg situation and they need to be able to have a tool to have SOME impact on the PvP. There's an ability called multi-fighting sat there, gathering dust. Make it worthwhile and just to point out that this has some actual sense behind the idea, the equivilent ability "sharpshooter" removes the penalty for firing into interlock from outside it. My proposed change would remove some of the restrictions of being an MA in interlock with people firing into interlock at you.
Yasamuu wrote:Vosiler wrote:Yasamuu wrote:You don't know that it can be exploited 100% at all. You're speculating that it can. Unless you yourself have physically activated a hyper twice then you're just speculating that it can be done. If it can be done, /bug it but I doubt it can be.And 2v1's are not impossible to win either. so if there not impossiable why are people crying about i? i know it can be done and i have proof and buged it, but there will always be exploits dosent matter what you do, there will always be a way to cheatthats life get over it.Uh. What have I to get over? You're the one complaining about exploiting. Not me. I think I just stated, there will always be people out to try and exploit but we shouldn't be punished for them wanting to do that. The point I'm making is that Interlock classes are absolutely pointless in a zerg situation and they need to be able to have a tool to have SOME impact on the PvP. There's an ability called multi-fighting sat there, gathering dust. Make it worthwhile and just to point out that this has some actual sense behind the idea, the equivilent ability "sharpshooter" removes the penalty for firing into interlock from outside it. My proposed change would remove some of the restrictions of being an MA in interlock with people firing into interlock at you. why not just change tree?, thats why they made it so your not tied to any tree so you can change it when you need to? or am i wrong?
Vosiler wrote:Yasamuu wrote:Vosiler wrote:Yasamuu wrote:You don't know that it can be exploited 100% at all. You're speculating that it can. Unless you yourself have physically activated a hyper twice then you're just speculating that it can be done. If it can be done, /bug it but I doubt it can be.And 2v1's are not impossible to win either. so if there not impossiable why are people crying about i? i know it can be done and i have proof and buged it, but there will always be exploits dosent matter what you do, there will always be a way to cheatthats life get over it.Uh. What have I to get over? You're the one complaining about exploiting. Not me. I think I just stated, there will always be people out to try and exploit but we shouldn't be punished for them wanting to do that. The point I'm making is that Interlock classes are absolutely pointless in a zerg situation and they need to be able to have a tool to have SOME impact on the PvP. There's an ability called multi-fighting sat there, gathering dust. Make it worthwhile and just to point out that this has some actual sense behind the idea, the equivilent ability "sharpshooter" removes the penalty for firing into interlock from outside it. My proposed change would remove some of the restrictions of being an MA in interlock with people firing into interlock at you. why not just change tree?, thats why they made it so your not tied to any tree so you can change it when you need to? or am i wrong?Because maybe he doesn't want to and shouldn't have to?
Some people like or prefer the duelist tree or the MA tree. Perhaps they aren't very good at the other trees. Point is that while the system allows for people to change trees that doesn't mean it should force you to change. Besides, you can't suddenly change your loadout whilst in IL and you suddenly get out numbered.
your not forced to
no ones forcing you to /pvp and get your Butt (wont let me use a better word) kicked thats your choice, also if your in il and some one shoots you i pretty sure you currently get a bonus from it a dev will have to correct me on this please, but its my understanding if your being attacked by some one while your in il you get an initiative bonus.
your not forced tono ones forcing you to /pvp and get your Butt (wont let me use a better word) kicked thats your choice, also if your in il and some one shoots you i pretty sure you currently get a bonus from it a dev will have to correct me on this please, but its my understanding if your being attacked by some one while your in il you get an initiative bonus.
I love MA my main 50 has been MA all the way back in cr1 and i dont see why i should have to swap out to a easyer mode in pvp. i have two other 50's Hacker and a Gunman for that when i need two. Most of us who use MA love IL thats why we use it
Vosiler wrote:your not forced tono ones forcing you to /pvp and get your Butt (wont let me use a better word) kicked thats your choice, also if your in il and some one shoots you i pretty sure you currently get a bonus from it a dev will have to correct me on this please, but its my understanding if your being attacked by some one while your in il you get an initiative bonus.You're missing the point. People shouldn't have to not use a certain loadout because of other ones nor should they stop because of it, you really need to get that through that skull of yours and stop being stupid.lol @ "if your being attacked by some one while your in il you get an initiative bonus"
Gerik wrote:Vosiler wrote:your not forced tono ones forcing you to /pvp and get your Butt (wont let me use a better word) kicked thats your choice, also if your in il and some one shoots you i pretty sure you currently get a bonus from it a dev will have to correct me on this please, but its my understanding if your being attacked by some one while your in il you get an initiative bonus.You're missing the point. People shouldn't have to not use a certain loadout because of other ones nor should they stop because of it, you really need to get that through that skull of yours and stop being stupid.lol @ "if your being attacked by some one while your in il you get an initiative bonus"try it and see, or are you just another one who pays a mxo sub not to play the game but to chat with friend on the fourms ?