Author |
Message |
 11/27/2008 01:01:53
|
Mainframe Invader
Joined: Sep 4, 2005
Messages: 349
Location: Illinois, buckingham
Offline
|
Hey all, I am just wondering about something. I currently have both the lucian's launcher and valkarie shades, each with 3% viral damage. I have the overdrive bandana with 10% viral damage, and i now have the sleepwalker pants with 3% viral damage. However, are there any shirts, coats (outerwear), shoes, and/or gloves that have 3% viral damage? I dont care if its a codable enhanced item, a collectors item, or a mission reward-type item, I am just wondering if any of them exist. Thanks for any information you can give.
|
|
 |
 11/27/2008 11:19:56
|
Jacked Out
Joined: Sep 7, 2005
Messages: 425
Location: The Antares | The Glitch Society - Machines | Syntax Instance
Offline
|
The only item that springs to my mind... but only 2% damage bonus 
Ravenfeather (Outerwear) Level: 20 Ballistic Damage Resistance (13pts) Viral Damage Bonus (2%) Thrown Resistance (13pts) Viral Accuracy Bonus (3%)
There are pants and shoes (I'm not sure about this) with 2% bonus, but I guess you already know them.
|
|
 |
 11/27/2008 11:26:52
|
Mainframe Invader
Joined: Sep 4, 2005
Messages: 349
Location: Illinois, buckingham
Offline
|
yah, i have the ravens feather. as well as shoes, a shirt, and gloves that all have 2%. up until last night i had pair of pants that had 2% as well, but they got replaced by the 3% sleepwalker pants, which is why I am looking for a shirt, jacket, gloves, and/or shoes with 3 %
|
|
 |
 11/27/2008 15:12:40
|
Jacked Out
Joined: Sep 24, 2005
Messages: 87
Offline
|
Just to point out, the system always rounds down to the next 5% bonus. So 84% viral damage bonus = 80% etc.
|
|
 |
 11/27/2008 18:30:42
|
Mainframe Invader
Joined: Sep 4, 2005
Messages: 349
Location: Illinois, buckingham
Offline
|
are you serious? if thats the case i can get rid of 3% damage and use it for is regain.
|
|
 |
 11/27/2008 19:12:22
|
Femme Fatale
Joined: Jun 6, 2006
Messages: 487
Location: Syntax
Offline
|
I always wear a Taggert's Pipeline top when mishing or whatever. It's got a great viral buff, but I don't remember if it's acc or dam. It's probably acc. And .. WTB Ravensfeather! Maybe I'll go post that in the marketplace .. hehe /as
|
|
 |
 11/27/2008 21:15:29
|
Jacked Out
Joined: Sep 24, 2005
Messages: 87
Offline
|
Tygrius wrote: are you serious? if thats the case i can get rid of 3% damage and use it for is regain.
I'm afraid so. The damage bonus is the only one I can test, as accuracy and all the other ones are a bit of luck anyway, but it definately doesn't change the viral damage points on the status tab or increase the damage done until its up to the next 5%. It's very very annoying as this kinda makes all the +2/3 % clothes effectively useless. Maybe that's why Rarebit has been adding +4% itemes recently!
|
|
 |
 11/28/2008 00:21:52
|
Ascendent Logic
Joined: Sep 4, 2005
Messages: 704
Location: Input-Hostile
Offline
|
It definatly isn't worth going for damage. it doesn't increase your damage by much espically since there's a wider aray of clothing and setups out there that do easily make the better choice. Thats my general pvp outlook on it anyway.
Message edited by kaosdevil on 11/28/2008 00:23:46.
|
|
 |
 11/28/2008 01:07:05
|
Jacked Out
Joined: Sep 24, 2005
Messages: 87
Offline
|
kaosdevil wrote: It definatly isn't worth going for damage. it doesn't increase your damage by much espically since there's a wider aray of clothing and setups out there that do easily make the better choice. Thats my general pvp outlook on it anyway.
Yep, accuracy = damage, having IS = damage. Thats how I look at it anyway...
|
|
 |
 11/28/2008 09:49:00
|
Mainframe Invader
Joined: Sep 4, 2005
Messages: 349
Location: Illinois, buckingham
Offline
|
kaosdevil wrote: It definatly isn't worth going for damage. it doesn't increase your damage by much espically since there's a wider aray of clothing and setups out there that do easily make the better choice. Thats my general pvp outlook on it anyway.
oh trust me, I dont use this set up on a PVP basis. it is purely for a "one hit kill pve type situation, or something where i can sit back and hack away with no worries of IL. so if my damage percent is at, say, 93 percent, unless I can get another 2 percent i might as well take away 3% damage from clothing and use it for other things.
|
|
 |
 05/03/2009 06:08:12
|
Virulent Mind
Joined: May 9, 2007
Messages: 151
Offline
|
I go for damage for easy npc kills. Although we all know my pvp skills aren't as great because I am nothing but damage; when it comes to killing npc's and being a hacker damage works great, but if you intend on pvping I would sugest concentrating on upping your defences and regain.
|
|
 |
 05/06/2009 05:07:34
|
Controller
Joined: Dec 30, 2007
Messages: 6
Offline
|
lucians launcher glasses and threadbare sleepwalker jeans for 3% and enhanced silverstripe dada shoes and ravensfeather coat for 2% those in pair gives you 5% and 5% what 3% shoes you have? I thought you'll never find regular drop shoes that will give 3%, certain damge bonus% items are setup that way. so when you have the best general drops you'll get a certain percent bonus. But thats what i told myself. Also you ever do the math with viral damage bonus% and the viral damage pts from the hacker style? or maybe i'm thinking of accuracy. To me it's almost liek there is a penalty applied to viral accuracy bonus% in the style(never seems rounded down to the nearest 5% or giving the full % either) liek it's always off by 3% or something. maybe it was just a bug i had DE or whatever. it seems the math is always off. it could be anything tho. hidden penalty? rounding. If your using IH in a team then you'd want damage but if your stated your not going to see that much. more. killing sleepwalkers with IH only gives you like 10 or 20 more damage per nuke, which you'll lose cause of the is regen lost from not having a dragon or seraphims on. but yeah if you go max damage when farming and its the diff between 1 nuke or 2 then go for max damage in pve.
Message edited by IncVoid on 05/06/2009 05:09:55.
|
|
 |
|