Author |
Message |
 12/14/2008 01:20:22
|
Controller
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Messages: 7
Offline
|
Short plz. So, I don't know if it has been proposed before...
Just an ideal solution to the PvP clothes issue... Why not make a tool that can "cut" the clothing stats from one piece of clothing, (i.e. Enhanced Gloves turns into Gloves) and "paste" the stats on another piece of clothing. (i.e. Gloves 2 turns into Enhanced Gloves 2) I'm sure it wouldn't be THAT difficult keeping it within the same type of clothing as well, so that glove stats can't turn into pants stats, if that were to cause uproar in the community. Not sure, just an idea I had that I thought I should throw out.
|
|
 |
 12/14/2008 01:36:42
|
Femme Fatale
Joined: Oct 27, 2007
Messages: 1223
Offline
|
The properties of every clothing item are bound together forming a single discrete item in the database. A lot of people would like to have a more fluid, dynamic clothing/buff system but it's just not possible considering our current resources and system. Unless, of course, Dracomet or someone pulls some serious magic out of the hat. All of this has been covered a number of times before but I guess hitting 'Search' is too much for some people.
|
|
 |
 12/14/2008 01:39:49
|
Controller
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Messages: 7
Offline
|
Cadsuane wrote: The properties of every clothing item are bound together forming a single discrete item in the database. A lot of people would like to have a more fluid, dynamic clothing/buff system but it's just not possible considering our current resources and system. Unless, of course, Dracomet or someone pulls some serious magic out of the hat. All of this has been covered a number of times before but I guess hitting 'Search' is too much for some people.
Ah, sorry. I tried searching, I'm just notoriously bad at using the search function. Lol.
|
|
 |
 12/15/2008 05:16:55
|
Systemic Anomaly
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Messages: 1012
Offline
|
I would really like something of the sort to come in. Not for having matching clothes or anything but more for the fact about me getting slagged for being a cowboy when i'm only wearing the hat for the acc 
|
|
 |
 12/15/2008 05:44:17
|
Vindicator
Joined: Aug 20, 2005
Messages: 3065
Location: Upstate NY
Offline
|
Virrago wrote: Also, I would much rather someone create a new thread then necro some 2 month old thread with old discussion in it as it is easier for us to read fresh threads then 2 month old ones.
|
|
 |
 12/15/2008 05:51:12
|
Jacked Out
Joined: Sep 18, 2005
Messages: 1204
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Offline
|
As true as that i ves, its also true that if you did actually search it you'd probably see the typical replies of "no resources" etc etc and we'd not have the thread in the first place.  Although i guess if we leave it it'll never get done... but will it ever so why bother? :/
|
|
 |
 12/15/2008 05:53:15
|
Systemic Anomaly
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Messages: 1012
Offline
|
Yeah i think this 'Search is your friend' style crap needs to stop. Not all of us have been here since beta and yeah belive it or not, new people are playing and thinkin of 'new' ideas. Waiting for the dead horse pic to come in next lol
|
|
 |
 12/15/2008 06:00:38
|
Jacked Out
Joined: Sep 18, 2005
Messages: 1204
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Offline
|
The_Bruceter wrote: Yeah i think this 'Search is your friend' style crap needs to stop. Not all of us have been here since beta and yeah belive it or not, new people are playing and thinkin of 'new' ideas. Waiting for the dead horse pic to come in next lol
I disagree with that kinda sardonic crap too but it still doesn't hurt to check if somethings been said before and isn't still being discussed for whatever reason (: Which is what i was getting at initially. If people don't then you can no doubt expect the onslaught of "'Search is your friend' style crap" 
|
|
 |
 12/15/2008 08:36:52
|
Vindicator
Joined: Aug 20, 2005
Messages: 3065
Location: Upstate NY
Offline
|
SonofdexII wrote:
Ah, sorry. I tried searching, I'm just notoriously bad at using the search function. Lol.
No harm done.
|
|
 |
|