Personality is not defined by how you dress.
When it comes to Vinia, at least, I think the pink hair would convey more than her choice of attire. " width="15" height="15" />
I have faith that the system can restore Agent Gray.
Illyria
(( I thought he was DEM when he first showed up, Imax... but I really doubt it, what with the "He's a human" thing.And I always make it a point to *not* wear the system suit at events.))
Vinia wrote:Personality is not defined by how you dress.No, but it can certainly be indicative of and most definately gives the first impression which is how 70 percent of the people you encounter will perceive you.
Archangel wrote:Vinia wrote:Personality is not defined by how you dress.No, but it can certainly be indicative of and most definately gives the first impression which is how 70 percent of the people you encounter will perceive you.Point made. Perception. People don't trust the Machines (Machinists exluded), that's why dressing up as one already gives the wrong idea.Personality is not defined by how you dress, but personality will be ignored once you make the wrong gestures. Speech ... is only 10% of what we perceive.Why do you think the Effectuator is so popular? He's wearing goddamn bermudas and a shirt, even if he goes to the Opera.- GG
Yeah, but you are thinking as a redpill, we do not dress up to change or create an image with you. You know most of us, we've both made impressions on each other, the first being a long time ago now. No, our appearance is to allow us to project a businesslike authority to those without knowledge of the war and the Machines, it also allows for possible recognition between redpills.
Perception is exactly why I dress as I do. I would rather attempt to look and be an authority with a bluepill in a fitted, pressed suit than in a very short skirt and crop top or even a skintight latex outfit...
(Story wise I don't see a purpose of "reviving" a backup of agent Gray since agent Pace can take care of things and he is also an older version i.e. not very capable of fighting as the other agents)
The Leo wrote:(Story wise I don't see a purpose of "reviving" a backup of agent Gray since agent Pace can take care of things and he is also an older version i.e. not very capable of fighting as the other agents)((Agent Gray was in the simulation when the Smith Virus took hold, now I know he doesn't have a 'son after his name but weren't all Agents upgraded after the first film? Also it is Pace that is the least capable in combat (as was written somewhere, possibly in her details) of Agents as her role was to make Machine-Human interaction easier. Gray also has experience on his side with dealing with Humans so I'd say his knowledge is invaluable))
Vinia wrote:The Leo wrote:(Story wise I don't see a purpose of "reviving" a backup of agent Gray since agent Pace can take care of things and he is also an older version i.e. not very capable of fighting as the other agents)((Agent Gray was in the simulation when the Smith Virus took hold, now I know he doesn't have a 'son after his name but weren't all Agents upgraded after the first film? Also it is Pace that is the least capable in combat (as was written somewhere, possibly in her details) of Agents as her role was to make Machine-Human interaction easier. Gray also has experience on his side with dealing with Humans so I'd say his knowledge is invaluable))(The upgraded agents literally vanished story wise in the game. The upgraded agents in the movies had names like Johnson, Thompson etc. but still seems weird since when Smith got terminated he came back as an exile and the machines didn't bring him back because he had no use. His knowledge of humans is data that the machines can easily store without having the issues trying to backup an agent)
