Mx0 ·· The balance of "options.cfg" and "useropts.cfg"

**Xeros**

Hmm...I wonder if I should give it a shot with my Core 2 Duo and Geforce 7950 GX2...

**Ikkaku**

Excellent!
We had to change the resolution though, no way we are running at 1024 x 768.
Other than that, it was amazing. Thanks for sharing.

**phi**

Here's the skinny on Useropts.cfg versus Options.cfg:...

Options.cfg is a file that gets overwritten occasionally (if a setting is changed by the devs for a patch) so nothing in there is safe from getting erased.

Useropts.cfg is loaded after options.cfg and it's settings override the settings in options.cfg.

Any settings in Useropts.cfg should be all you need, however I think the client only loads certain "Dev. only" settings from Options.cfg as the user is not meant to edit them.

Unless you find an exploit that gives you an unfair advantage by modifying these files, there should be no repercussions from SOE. These files are readily editable by users. Reverse compiling and changing the game code is the big no-no.

And Arzu... Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't after you. SMILEY

**arzubazman**

MXO - "options.cfg" and "useropts.cfg"

Hi phi!

Hihi, thats not me who is so paranoid, thats the sunshine Annie, who you think at. I am the opposite of that and had my bad experiences yet, because of that and my open kind.

I am not sure, but I meant absolutely the same like you about the "options.cfg" and "useropts.cfg". Ann told me, there are some settings which "useropts.cfg" can't hold constantly. I tested it, and I put all these special tags from "options.cfg" in "useropts.cfg" and it doesn't work, the quality is not more the same.

[•] I place some samples, when I come home this night

†

ciao

Arzu Bazman // [arzubazman] // «CONSTANCIA» // <TOPKAPI>

Danger_Frog1471

This is an interesting claim, im still a little weary on the options.cfg file but i just use the ones that other people have certified as working and "safe". This looks like something i could benifit from as i already have got some "enhanced" settings but i would like to see a little better preformance as sometimes it can stick or be laggy which is unfortunate.

If you could send me a copy of the best (highest) options that i could try out, thanks Kindeller

**arzubazman** · 05/22/2009 14:31:22

MXO - "options.cfg" and "useropts.cfg"

Hi phi!

I made some new photos from the city (Richland) and a RSI photo from my face to show the quality and these absolute clean lines and curves. As I told in this thread yet, these all are pictures direct from MXO screenshot function, nothing was edited, no afterrendering was made (clean, naked images out of MXO).

[•] I place next samples from Downtown and Westview soon.

[+] Here are all photos in their original resolution 1280x1024x24x72

http://devx.ch/msb...s054.jpg http://devx.ch/msb...s055.jpg http://devx.ch/msb...s056.jpg http://devx.ch/msb...s057.jpg http://devx.ch/msb...s058.jpg http://devx.ch/msb...s059.jpg http://devx.ch/msb...s060.jpg http://devx.ch/msb...s061.jpg http://devx.ch/msb...s062.jpg http://devx.ch/msb...s063.jpg

†

ciao

Arzu Bazman // [arzubazman] // «CONSTANCIA» // <TOPKAPI>

**ArchBISH0P**

Simply amazing, please pm how you get these results what your settings are..

**UniToxic**

Looking Nice, cant wait to see if I can get this to work on mine.
Mind PMing me the Settings for these?

Regards,
Shaun

DragonStorm

Wow! Please could you send me a copy of your Useropts.cfg and your Options.cfg files!

**EndlessVoid**

... And, I think my settings got overwritten, somehow.

Do you think I could trouble you lovely ladies for those files, one more time?

I promise not to destroy them, this time. Honestly.

- Void

**MxO-PhanthomZtryker**

EndlessVoid wrote:

... And, I think my settings got overwritten, somehow.

- Void

Omg Noz!
It's Smith!
Hurry, Void! Return your settings to the source!

**EndlessVoid**

Pfft. The last time I returned anything to the Source...
... You know, I don't think I've ever returned anything to the Source.

- Void

**arzubazman** · 07/27/2008 14:40:04

MXO - "options.cfg" and "useropts.cfg"

Hi all!

I made some new photos from our lovely city and some RSI photos with a fantastic quality. All pictures are made with the MXO screenshot function only, nothing was edited, no afterrendering was made.

[•] I place next samples from "org" constructs.

[+] Here are more photos in their original resolution 1280x1024x24x72

†

ciao

Arzu Bazman // [arzubazman] // «CONSTANCIA» // <TOPKAPI>

vivi44

Your Crazy Arzu, you know that? SMILEY

Lovely pictures though.

**annbazman**

Mx0 ·· The balance of "options.cfg" and "useropts.cfg"

Hi all!

I wanted let you know, if someone has still problems with the performance, after loading my "cfg" files, I can send you a new file a (x1.00+) version. The graphic quality is absolutely same, only the far view distance is not higher like in other files, the distance is like the original mxo settings, as they were made from the devs. This is the only difference between the files (x1.00+), (x1.25), (x1.50), (x2.00). In short words: All files higher then (x1.00+) are the best graphic quality and extended far view distance, and (x1.00+) has the best graphic quality and the same far view distance as the original mxo setting, as it was after a fresh install.

[•] I have a simple PC: 1 GB RAM and 128 MB VRAM (video card). I use (x1.25) for normal mxo playing and (x2.00) for photography.

bye

Ann Bazman · "annbazman" · «CONSTANCIA» · <TOPKAPI>