I was only in about the 3rd grade when this happened, so I don't remember that much.

I do remember watching it on the news. It was... not good.

I'm not a fan of conspiracy theories, never have been. And I couldn't care less about the moon landing.

I'm open to every aspect with regards to 9/11 at the moment. Just looking around there a lot of different arguments, some are a lot more justifiable than others. And some are plain silly.

Like I said, there are a lot of questions still left unanswered, and a lot of secrecy still surrounding it. Not to mention things that havn't been explained yet, like the Squibs seen ejecting from the tower, underneath the area that was gradually collapsing.

Fact: 9/11 was a terrorist act.

phi wrote:

Fact: 9/11 was a terrorist act.

But unknown to us are who the real terrorists are.


Everyone has a right to thier own opinion and point of view. Mine happens to be that it was an inside job, and there is no stronger evidence of this then the secrecy surrounding the entire incident.

One of my favorite statistics is the Clinton Vs. 9-11 stat.

40 million dollars was spent investigating Bill Clinton's adultry, and only a few hundred thousand was spent investigating 9-11.

Here is a fun film to watch.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...167662031629480


And please as the OP stated, keep it clean. And respect other's opinions.

Well on the bright side it was 40 million well spent.

privaron0 wrote:

Well on the bright side it was 40 million well spent.

Not really sure we should be making jokes about this subject, but I'll induldge you.

Exactly... and in a side by side comparison, its as if our govt. did hardly any investigating at all into a matter that was a hell of a lot worse. On one hand Bill got a BJ, on the other thousands of people were murderd. Which incedent should get more attention?

That was a rhetorical question btw.

./facepalm

If its not this video is Zeitgeist. Before you start running off and preaching this as gospel do yourself a favor and actually watch or read some of the debunkings done to these so called facts. I'd start here as it covers a majority of the areas most conspirators focus on but you can find just as many videos on youtube that cover it all also.

privaron0 wrote:

Well on the bright side it was 40 million well spent.

Not really sure we should be making jokes about this subject, but I'll induldge you.

Exactly...  and in a side by side comparison, its as if our govt. did hardly any investigating at all into a matter that was a hell of a lot worse. On one hand Bill got a BJ, on the other thousands of people were murderd. Which incedent should get more attention?

That was a rhetorical question btw.

Clinton:  "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"

Seamen stained dress?  Well, looks like we have to investigate during a huge political firestorm (throw money).

Twin towers.  Planes ran into them - they fell down (simple enough).  Investigation?  Why?  We already had all of the information aside from debunking BS excuses like "It doesn't melt at such temperatures".

Or of you want the simplified, physics aspect of it:  Planes full of jet fuel slammed into the towers which produced heat hot enough to cause the structure to lose more than half of its structural integrity.  That combined with the fact that they also took out much of the structure as it is, and that several more stories were crushing down at the area of impact, it eventually gave way and came tumbling down.

Don't believe  me?  Then answer this:  How would a government, that mishandled Katrina as badly as it did, be able to pull of such a Conspiracy on a grand scale without a single defactor?

Wowzers

imax wrote:

privaron0 wrote:

Well on the bright side it was 40 million well spent.

Not really sure we should be making jokes about this subject, but I'll induldge you.

Exactly... and in a side by side comparison, its as if our govt. did hardly any investigating at all into a matter that was a hell of a lot worse. On one hand Bill got a BJ, on the other thousands of people were murderd. Which incedent should get more attention?

That was a rhetorical question btw.

Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"

Seamen stained dress? Well, looks like we have to investigate during a huge political firestorm (throw money).

 

Twin towers. Planes ran into them - they fell down (simple enough). Investigation? Why? We already had all of the information aside from debunking BS excuses like "It doesn't melt at such temperatures".

Or of you want the simplified, physics aspect of it: Planes full of jet fuel slammed into the towers which produced heat hot enough to cause the structure to lose more than half of its structural integrity. That combined with the fact that they also took out much of the structure as it is, and that several more stories were crushing down at the area of impact, it eventually gave way and came tumbling down.

 

Don't believe me? Then answer this: How would a government, that mishandled Katrina as badly as it did, be able to pull of such a Conspiracy on a grand scale without a single defactor?

 

Wowzers

imax wrote:

privaron0 wrote:

Well on the bright side it was 40 million well spent.

Not really sure we should be making jokes about this subject, but I'll induldge you.

Exactly...  and in a side by side comparison, its as if our govt. did hardly any investigating at all into a matter that was a hell of a lot worse. On one hand Bill got a BJ, on the other thousands of people were murderd. Which incedent should get more attention?

That was a rhetorical question btw.

Clinton:  "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"

Seamen stained dress?  Well, looks like we have to investigate during a huge political firestorm (throw money).

 

Twin towers.  Planes ran into them - they fell down (simple enough).  Investigation?  Why?  We already had all of the information aside from debunking BS excuses like "It doesn't melt at such temperatures".

Or of you want the simplified, physics aspect of it:  Planes full of jet fuel slammed into the towers which produced heat hot enough to cause the structure to lose more than half of its structural integrity.  That combined with the fact that they also took out much of the structure as it is, and that several more stories were crushing down at the area of impact, it eventually gave way and came tumbling down.

 

Don't believe  me?  Then answer this:  How would a government, that mishandled Katrina as badly as it did, be able to pull of such a Conspiracy on a grand scale without a single defactor?

 

Wowzers

timeframe01 wrote:

imax wrote:

privaron0 wrote:

Well on the bright side it was 40 million well spent.

Not really sure we should be making jokes about this subject, but I'll induldge you.

Exactly... and in a side by side comparison, its as if our govt. did hardly any investigating at all into a matter that was a hell of a lot worse. On one hand Bill got a BJ, on the other thousands of people were murderd. Which incedent should get more attention?

That was a rhetorical question btw.

Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"

Seamen stained dress? Well, looks like we have to investigate during a huge political firestorm (throw money).

 

Twin towers. Planes ran into them - they fell down (simple enough). Investigation? Why? We already had all of the information aside from debunking BS excuses like "It doesn't melt at such temperatures".

Or of you want the simplified, physics aspect of it: Planes full of jet fuel slammed into the towers which produced heat hot enough to cause the structure to lose more than half of its structural integrity. That combined with the fact that they also took out much of the structure as it is, and that several more stories were crushing down at the area of impact, it eventually gave way and came tumbling down.

 

Don't believe me? Then answer this: How would a government, that mishandled Katrina as badly as it did, be able to pull of such a Conspiracy on a grand scale without a single defactor?

 

Wowzers

Answer: Nature is unpredictiable, and the Govt. did not create a hurrican to slam into a weak levy which broke.

Answer these questions. What hit the pentagon, and what caused building seven to collapse, and why did the govt. lie about not having video survielence of the pentagon attack, and why did they confiscate survielence videos from hotels and gas stations pointing directly at the pentagon during the attack, why wont they release those videos?

Should I keep going?