01 Data Uplink

**MetaLogic**

Dxy wrote:

Thankfully I can't hear any of this.

But you're not hearing it, you're reading it.

**Fen**

An oldie, but goodie:

Delicho

Zudrag wrote:

Sneaker wrote:
MrPuck wrote:
MrP poking a little fun
Over-reaction
You just lost the game.

^

**Ballak**

Delicho wrote:

Zudrag wrote:
Sneaker wrote:
MrPuck wrote:
MrP poking a little fun
Over-reaction
You just lost the game.

^

^

**Mave**

Ballak wrote:

Delicho wrote:
Zudrag wrote:
Sneaker wrote:
MrPuck wrote:
MrP poking a little fun
Over-reaction
You just lost the game.

^
^

C-C-COMBO BREAKER!

**MetaLogic**

Fen wrote:

An oldie, but goodie:

/thread

**Rarebit**

Um... Don't drag me into your flame-baiting, please.

**EndlessVoid**

Fen wrote:

An oldie, but goodie:

- Void

**Trilateral**

Rarebit wrote:

DN1 drama is not going to solve the problem.

Now that is what I call being excessively negative.

**Archangel**

GQubed wrote:

Archangel wrote:
Actually, EPN used to have one of these things but it was run by the players.

This doesn't seem like something LESIG should be in charge of. Seems like they'd just be setting themselves up for too many accusations and potential problems, especially with the sort of things that have been happening recently.

So, in my humble opinion: good idea, bad execution.
This is a great idea to help bring the machinist of recursion together, which I understand would be a bad thing from your perspective Yah " /> We just need to remember that sometimes things happen, and it has nothing to do with inter faction rivalry or espionage or trickery or voodoo, call them Ghosts in the Machines, or whatever you like but a glitch doth not make a conspiracy.

Never said it was a bad idea. On the contrary, I think it's a superb idea. Congrats to you machinists on starting to get organized. I've missed having some good old fashioned Machine antagonism. All I'm saying, is for obvious reasons, liaisons shouldn't be in charge of this project. Case and point being, what if a moderation issue comes up? Liaisons aren't supposed to go OOC. How do you address a liaison in that instance? What if a liaisons brings there personal feelings into a matter? How does it get addressed? As I said before, awesome idea, bad implementation.

Crowlos

Rarebit wrote:

Um... Don't drag me into your flame-baiting, please.

"Dev-Owned!"

**GQubed** · 02/24/2008 10:14:47

It's all working now from what I understand, so I am going to let this thread die. I'll speak to you ingame Yah, I always love our conversations.

MrPuck · 02/24/2008 10:56:46

Rarebit wrote:

Um... Don't drag me into your flame-baiting, please.

Edit. I yanked the LULZY image because I remembered, Here in the Matrix you can shoot someone in the face and drown people in their pods and even be a terrorist, but you cant show an image with the word *poop* in it.

**Dxy**

Mave wrote:

Ballak wrote:
Delicho wrote:
Zudrag wrote:
Sneaker wrote:
MrPuck wrote:
MrP poking a little fun
Over-reaction
You just lost the game.

^
^

C-C-COMBO BREAKER!

**Presence**

Locked at OP request.