Station.com
Sign In Join Free Why Join?
Sony Online Entertainment
Community Store My Account Help
  Search   |   Recent Topics   |   Member Listing   |   Back to home page
Content: Takeover Towers
Search inside this topic:
The Matrix Online » Top » Development Discussion » Development Roundtable Previous Topic  |  Next Topic      Go to Page: Previous  1 , 2
Author Message


Ascendent Logic

Joined: Mar 16, 2006
Messages: 4809
Online

Ballak wrote:

I kind of have to interject this.

Say we put Turf Warz into MxO. What's really there to motivate them to do anything at all with this new system? Everyone already PvPs mostly at Mara. No one gets anything but pointless CQs and the thrill of PvP.

Why make these "turf" things around the city a viable thing to PvP for. I mean isn't that just basically what the constructs were for? Look how that turned out.

I mean honestly taxation won't work, because no one really buys anything from vendors anymore. And no one really cares about owning a building, or some zone buff no one really goes to and even if there was a buff, you can't make it a game-changing one. So in the end you'd have to put in PvP Rewards, but hurr that's a whole 'nother thread.

I seriously can't decide if you're sarcastic or not.




Vindicator

Joined: Aug 21, 2006
Messages: 3158
Location: ALL YOUR AVATARS ARE BELONG TO ME
Offline

Honestly I think the whole idea is a joke because the chances of this being implemented are slim to none, GG, but if you would seriously want to implement something like this, you need to give players motivation to do it.

And no, you can't make the buff a game-changing buff. Players who would have a decisive advantage over others would just simply "hold" the turf forever since unbuffed players wouldn't stand a chance. It's like fighting someone fully buffed from Upgrade Master, and told, "If you can't beat him, you can't have those buffs and you can't get said reward for holding this turf."


Message edited by Ballak on 12/13/2008 13:51:21.



Mainframe Invader

Joined: Jan 5, 2006
Messages: 417
Location: The Watchmen
Offline

Ballak wrote:

I kind of have to interject this.

Say we put Turf Warz into MxO. What's really there to motivate them to do anything at all with this new system? Everyone already PvPs mostly at Mara. No one gets anything but pointless CQs and the thrill of PvP.

That's the point, at the moment no one gets anything but pointless cq and fun, with this idea they contribute to the org's power standing points. People can continue to "already pvp at mara" but this time there are points of interest in the immediate area. Teams will have to stop reinforcements joining their attacking or defending group while they are in transit, hold the area after a sweep, or try and powerless someone while they are flipping the switch.

If there is 11 mech and 2 zion... the zions would try to get one of the unattended towers which means the larger group might send 2 or 3 to guard the other two towers (zion in this scenario gets fun balanced pvp while trying to take over the tower) if they won their 2v3 they could capture the tower and get buffed to hell allowing them to take on the 2v11 at the main tower.

 

Ballak wrote:

Why make these "turf" things around the city a viable thing to PvP for. I mean isn't that just basically what the constructs were for? Look how that turned out.

some don't like the long time wait to get back into the construct for pvp. so they just go to Mara, with the towers this allows them to fight at mara or other districts should there be a concensus to do so.

with the clubs, I think people would find it fun to run with 50 others into a club full of 50 reds and have a large battle with an objective. There would be a specified time and allot of people would log on for the attack. Likewise for those defending, one of the best pvp defend events I was in we had to protect zaitso on vector the reds slowly poured in to the room, that would have been about 50v50.

and what then after a club siege? well they can go back to mara, should the numbers not be in their favour they don't have to logout, they can use the towers to keep the fun balanced

 

Ballak wrote:

I mean honestly taxation won't work, because no one really buys anything from vendors anymore. And no one really cares about owning a building, or some zone buff no one really goes to and even if there was a buff, you can't make it a game-changing one.

Taxation would be for the areas where factions own clubs. The book store at Midian East sells construct books for 200k, archive tickets for 50k and org keys for 1000k, I wouldn't be surprised if a billion info gets put through there each week, capturing Avalon for 2 weeks or 4 or 6 could be profitable to a faction, this could help with gearing the pvpers in the group and funding the farmers that get the gear instead of the book store info going nowhere into a money sink




Mainframe Invader

Joined: Jan 5, 2006
Messages: 417
Location: The Watchmen
Offline

Ballak wrote:

Honestly I think the whole idea is a joke because the chances of this being implemented are slim to none, GG, but if you would seriously want to implement something like this, you need to give players motivation to do it.

And no, you can't make the buff a game-changing buff. Players who would have a decisive advantage over others would just simply "hold" the turf forever since unbuffed players wouldn't stand a chance. It's like fighting someone fully buffed from Upgrade Master, and told, "If you can't beat him, you can't have those buffs and you can't get said reward for holding this turf."

 

The bufs scale depending on which group is failing at the time. The point of the bufs is NOT to enhance the winning side... the point of the buffs is to enhance the loosing side so they CAN take on the winning side. The best fights are when it's evenly matched.




Vindicator

Joined: Aug 21, 2006
Messages: 3158
Location: ALL YOUR AVATARS ARE BELONG TO ME
Offline

Sorry, but I just don't see this happening. There's a few other MMO's that do that, but I honestly haven't played any of them. I doubt 1bil of info goes through the Archivists weekly, because the majority of people arn't stupid enough to pay 100,000,000 info just to fight a high level npc that drops a wall-kick pill. Besides, the Archivists are all org-based to begin with which relate directly with the constructs so you couldn't really "take these over" to begin with. And over all, I don't think sticking a tower 3 feet away from the hardline is really going to spice PvP up a bit.

But if it's any consolation Natasha, I thought the pictures you made were nice.




Veteran Operative

Joined: Jan 15, 2008
Messages: 326
Location: New Zion
Offline

Wow. This is Dulux's idea v 2.0.

how about we put one of those useless helicopters flying above Megacity, on the roof of these towers. And then the warcry of the attackers would be: "Get to the choppaaaah!"

...

no pun intended , but i'm curious to whether this is the follow-up to a global resignation of the playerbase on the storyline and a redirection of efforts towards the combat system.

way i see it, you're saying RP is dead, long live PeeVPee.

why do i have the feeling that pvp ideas will be taken in consideration, as opposed to RP ones (i.e.) solutions to content lack, restructuring, etc.

this is not aimed at natasha/steele, nice brainstorming results.

 


Message edited by NeoExcidious on 12/13/2008 14:22:30.



Jacked Out

Joined: May 9, 2006
Messages: 625
Location: Ontario, Canada
Offline

NeoExcidious wrote:

no pun intended , but i'm curious to whether this is the follow-up to a global resignation of the playerbase on the storyline and a redirection of efforts towards the combat system.

way i see it, you're saying RP is dead, long live PeeVPee.

why do i have the feeling that pvp ideas will be taken in consideration, as opposed to RP ones (i.e.) solutions to content lack, restructuring, etc.

this is not aimed at natasha/steele, nice brainstorming results.

 

I actually envisioned this as something that could help the story of the game, especially in the way I explained it in the Warfare board on the Syntax forums. That idea is considerably different from the one posted here but it had challenges by orgs and events of opportunity where something that is taking place, like the Merv testing an improved, I dunno, commando, that would allow the machines or zion to attack them and establish dominance. I think PVP should but used to make RP and the overall story BETTER.



Ascendent Logic

Joined: Aug 16, 2005
Messages: 921
Offline

I like it!  I don't know about the actual towers being put there because that would probably mess with the district to much and require repacking or whatever but maybe some sort of beacon thingy with a small pvp zone like radius placed in various places and that they follow whatever buff thing you were thinking about or points. although if this was done it would be awesome, I see the insentive of trying to take command of an area. I mean it wasn't too long ago people were begging for houses (now we got the org areas).




Systemic Anomaly

Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Messages: 1012
Offline

PvP Content!!!

The reason why pvp never really goes away from mara is because there is no content. If there was PvP (not PvE with flagging) content, of course more people would make their way to it.

I still like SkyBruins idea about Access Nodes round the city as pvp areas.




Veteran Operative

Joined: Jan 15, 2008
Messages: 326
Location: New Zion
Offline

The_Bruceter wrote:

I still like SkyBruins idea about Access Nodes round the city as pvp areas.

Vector it.




Fansite Operator

Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Messages: 89
Location: Manchester UK
Offline

How about this idea;-

Phone Tag.

If people are flag as PVP, they only have access to the hardlines which have been tagged by their organisation.

A Hard line is tagged by taking the faction of the last red pill to use it. Everytime a Hardline is tagged, you get points.

However if you loose a hardline, and you are within a certain radius of it, you loos points.

Something like this been suggested before?



Free Mind

Joined: Nov 4, 2008
Messages: 132
Location: Syntax
Offline

Hmm...I consider myself to be a huge RPer on Syntax. I've never really hung around Mara because PVP doesn't really attract me. But doesn't it seem like this idea would be better implemented or integrated into constructs? Having towers around would definitely increase the PVP population and range. Which isn't a bad thing at all, if you enjoy it.

Personally, it's not something I'd go for. I'd care more about the lack of RP than worrying about how to make the already rich community of PVP any better.


Veteran Hacker

Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Messages: 178
Location: Recursion - RP-PVE
Offline

It would be great to see new pvp content.  I wouldnt mind seeing something like tower control in the Datamine.




Femme Fatale

Joined: Nov 29, 2006
Messages: 232
Offline

Vinia wrote:

I must agree with GG, they look out of place in the bluepill world and seem to suggest a mutual agreement with all 3 Orgs to fight there.

Now if there were three tower blocks close together in downtown, that could work...


Yeah, thats my beef with this. I mean, it is SUPPOSED to be a normal city that Operatives are covertly moving through on Operations. I can't see the Machines allowing permanent War Towers to occupy some obvious part of the city, like a public park in front of a church.

My counter to this is, what about the contruction zones? Many of the construction zones already have a serires of skeleton "towers" that are supposed to be the substructure of new buildings. They also have those big cranes, and I've always been a little dissapointed that you can't land on or use the cranes. Maybe these could be slightly modified for this idea?

So I'd say the idea sounds neat, but I'm not for converting regular neighborhoods into war zones. Just because some people could care less about the Matrix world as anything other than a pvp arena, doesn't mean we should just convert the whole city into a battlefield.




Controller

Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Messages: 7
Offline

I feel like I'm going to end up making a bad name for myself on the forum just re-presenting old ideas that were already shot down...

 

But why not make some system that involves getting items for points or ranks from PvP?

 

Nothing game changing, just something nifty to have, so you can be like, "I killed 10 people, I got some shiny gloves."

 

Just some 2 $i.


 
The Matrix Online » Top » Development Discussion » Development Roundtable Go to Page: Previous  1 , 2
Go to:   

Version 2.2.7.43