Tesma wrote:

Really I dont care anymore merge the servers, Ill just throw the pain in the arse people on ignore like I've been doing for tha past 4 years.

Personally I'm going to wait until after the winter event to see what it's like before stating whether I'm for a merge. Until then I'm not for the reasons that ShiXin put in the against case.

Darkangelus wrote:

A post to clarify my view on the situation.

5.Faction naming will be an issue. for example there is a faction called "Daniel Institute of Dream Interpretation" on recursion and "The Daniel Institute" on syntax worst case scenario there will be some arguments. but then take into account...

E Pluribus Neo - EPN exist on all of the servers i believe.
One will have to be renamed as i dont think the database can handle more than one of the same name, not to mention the confusion to players.

Uh yeah, if you haven't seen yet, they came over and made their faction on Syntax.

From what I heard, the faction on Vector died out a while ago and the one I'm in on Syntax, we just created it a month ago on Recursion, so I don't see a problem with it.

Darkangelus wrote:

Syntax is not very healthy itself

E Pluribus Neo - EPN exist on all of the servers i believe.
One will have to be renamed as i dont think the database can handle more than one of the same name, not to mention the confusion to players. 

Syntax is very healthy.

E Pluribus Neo is on Syntax, Pluribus Neo is on Recursion.  No problem.

Virrago wrote:

We currently have no plans for any server merges at this time.

That does not however mean you guys are not allowed to talk about them and we do read your opinions in these threads.

Also, I would much rather someone create a new thread then necro some 2 month old thread with old discussion in it as it is easier for us to read fresh threads then 2 month old ones.

Oh and for you guys flaming the Original Poster, you are not the forum police. That is my job, report the post and we will make the determination on if it violates a rule, rather then you quoting rules at someone which just leads to turning the thread into a flame fest.

 

Gotta Love Virrago! <3

I personally would welcome a server merg wheres the harm in a bigger population...

But if your gonna merg all 3 make it hostile coz I love lil old vector!

Fankuuu pleaseee!

The only reason people "forum police'd" in this thread, is just like the same time everyone gets the oh-so-fantastic and original idea to make a thread about sword combat. Or more animations. Maybe new abilities? Immediately they are shot down due to the fact that it's simply not possible, unless it is regurgitated from NPCs in this game. This thread about a server merge has definitely never been the first. Just because a thread is in a different forum and is a few months old doesn't really in my mind deserve to be reposted. If your opinion changes, why don't you just say so in the previous thread. Everytime someone posts a thread like this, there's either drama or people praying for a server merge to save their dying game (which honestly doesn't look that way in my eyes). In the end, Virrago said it himself, there are no plans for a server merge. And there have never been plans for a server merge since the previous one which was a long time ago.

As for my view? Well I wouldn't mind a server merge, but you know let's all discuss server merging like we always do, only to make another thread in the next 2 months when all we do then is just do the same thing we did in the previous thread. "Yes, no, maybe so." and avast, there are no server merges. I think that's called beating a dead horse.

That's really all I have to say.

Ballad...  Did you read Virrago's post? Read again.  So yes, this time a dev actually said something. I call that Progress.

well for what i get of Virrago's post is its not in planning but he doesnt exclude the possibility, so i think this thread has been very succesful in pointing out the views of most players who had a constructive opinion.

Avath wrote:

Ballad...  Did you read Virrago's post? Read again.  So yes, this time a dev actually said something. I call that Progress.

Virrago doesn't develop for MxO, he's the forum admin/Community Rep for Mxo.

eval wrote:

Avath wrote:

Ballad...  Did you read Virrago's post? Read again.  So yes, this time a dev actually said something. I call that Progress.

Virrago doesn't develop for MxO, he's the forum admin/Community Rep for Mxo.

sorry but i have seen him in mara and other districts fooling around with stuff , i say he does have something to do with it, dont think he does it as a hobby.

Virrago isnt a dev for mxo, he's the community relations for us. He has admin commands he can use ingame just like any csr.

Gerik wrote:

Darkangelus wrote:

A post to clarify my view on the situation.

5.Faction naming will be an issue. for example there is a faction called "Daniel Institute of Dream Interpretation" on recursion and "The Daniel Institute" on syntax worst case scenario there will be some arguments. but then take into account...

E Pluribus Neo - EPN exist on all of the servers i believe.
One will have to be renamed as i dont think the database can handle more than one of the same name, not to mention the confusion to players.

Uh yeah, if you haven't seen yet, they came over and made their faction on Syntax.

From what I heard, the faction on Vector died out a while ago and the one I'm in on Syntax, we just created it a month ago on Recursion, so I don't see a problem with it.

Correct, it no longer exists. We have some good EPN factions, but I haven't seen the official one in ages.

Avath wrote:

Jahzel-Jah wrote:

eval wrote:

Avath wrote:

Ballad...  Did you read Virrago's post? Read again.  So yes, this time a dev actually said something. I call that Progress.

Virrago doesn't develop for MxO, he's the forum admin/Community Rep for Mxo.

sorry but i have seen him in mara and other districts fooling around with stuff , i say he does have something to do with it, dont think he does it as a hobby.

And he certainly knows more about the game than regular players, like yourself.

Vuudoo wrote:

Virrago isnt a dev for mxo, he's the community relations for us. He has admin commands he can use ingame just like any csr.

QFT Vuudoo.

Avath, eval was simply correcting a mistake you made and politely informed you of Virrago's actual job for your information, and while he does have direct communications with the Devs, perhaps some info on short term plans and the usual admin controls, actually having more knowledge about the game and it's mechanics then a dedicated player itself is pure speculation, no offence to Virrago himself.

As for progress, the same comment may have been made in the other recent thread (as you can see it's locked now) if that was filling up with flames and/or spam and/or policing about the subject.

I'm just thankful that Virrago even checked with the Dev's about the subject instead of simply telling everyone not to spam, police etc.. but I doubt he'll be so accommodating next time.

On this precident though I'm going to wait to see what new thread about an old topic will be brought up next with the intention of perhaps getting any more information... >_>

Honestly, see people that just type 'Dead Horse' etc, dam stay out the supposed discussion if you have nothing relevant to add...

Yasa, was a bit disappointed about what you put. I simply don't like the pvp over there. Perma flag pvp is the way to go. Honestly, think i could rack up 150 cqs in 3 days solo on vector? (and no it ain't cause theres more people on syntax, its just the same people that do pvp over there, which i would say is less than on vector)

As for a merge, syntax doesn't need it. Vector and Reccy seem as though they would but yeah theres the prob about perma flag and non hostile... I'd be all up for transfers (i don't care about people not lvln on a hostile server, their loss cause its fun. Plus nowadays it is so much easier to lvl over there)

The_Bruceter wrote:

Yasa, was a bit disappointed about what you put. I simply don't like the pvp over there. Perma flag pvp is the way to go. Honestly, think i could rack up 150 cqs in 3 days solo on vector? (and no it ain't cause theres more people on syntax, its just the same people that do pvp over there, which i would say is less than on vector)

 

Thats fair enough, dude. It's your opinion <3.

Maybe I didn't stress the point enough, but what I meant was that IF all three were merged (Still find it unlikely to happen for a long time), and we had to take the hit of it being non-hostile all over I wouldn't mind because those who want to PvP and play solely for PvP on all three servers at the moment would constantly flag, so there would still be some great PvP.

By the same token, I know on Vector that if I don't want to PvP I'll jump to a hardline out of the way so that nobody will really come accross me. So, from that perspective, I wouldn't mind it being completely hostile.

Again, if it was 2 non-hostile districts and 2 hostile ones I'd be happy.

tl;dr, I'm perched upon a fence, easy come easy go, happy either way, etc etc.

Vinia wrote:

Vuudoo wrote:

Virrago isnt a dev for mxo, he's the community relations for us. He has admin commands he can use ingame just like any csr.

Avath, eval was simply correcting a mistake you made and politely informed you of Virrago's actual job for your information, and while he does have direct communications with the Devs, perhaps some info on short term plans and the usual admin controls, actually having more knowledge about the game and it's mechanics then a dedicated player itself is pure speculation, no offence to Virrago himself.

I'm just thankful that Virrago even checked with the Dev's about the subject instead of simply telling everyone not to spam, police etc.. but I doubt he'll be so accommodating next time.

 

The Community Relations team is considered part of what ever dev team they are assigned to. The Community Relations team is not part of the Customer Service Department.

And no, I will not be as accommodating to any more flaming, spamming, or trolling in this thread.