<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Latest posts for the topic &quot;Datamine - Free For All *AND* Team Based PvP&quot;</title>
<ttl>10</ttl>
<link>http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/</link>
<description>Latest messages posted in the topic &quot;Datamine - Free For All *AND* Team Based PvP&quot;</description>
<generator>Station Forums</generator>
<item>
<title>Datamine - Free For All *AND* Team Based PvP</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m sure this was discussed here before, but now that Datamine has taken kindof a back seat to Sati&apos;s Playground, I think it&apos;s safe to discuss it again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am wondering if&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;a) it is possible for Rarebit to change Datamine FFA pvp so that if you are teamed with someone they are not hostile to you?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;b) what does the player base think about making this change to Datamine?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know that team-based pvp has long been something the pvp community has desired for this game. I can remember people begging for this on the white forums during Beta. I also think it would be a huge bonus to Datamine, giving us just one more reason to go there. Thirdly, non-hostile teaming means rezzing inside DM would be possible, which would also benefit Datamine by alleviating the construct exit/entrance problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, what does everyone else think?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488806#36300488806</guid>
<link>http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488806#36300488806</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
<author>ShiXinFeng</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:Datamine - Free For All *AND* Team Based PvP</title>
<description>Seeing as how most people already do or did this in Datamine, I don&apos;t see the harm in doing so. However, I suppose it would boil down to risk vs reward on that. If you team with people, that would lower the level of hostilities in the place, and thus - would the payout have to take another hit with the nerfbat? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Either way, people do this already (as far as teaming) and just avoid attacking each other while they farm Raeder or whatever. &lt;br /&gt;I&apos;d go with it personally.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488817#36300488817</guid>
<link>http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488817#36300488817</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:52:35 GMT</pubDate>
<author>Travi</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:Datamine - Free For All *AND* Team Based PvP</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Travi. One point your post made me think about is that, if you are teamed in Datamine, there are a great many abilitites (such as the entire Howitzer/Destroyer tree) that you can&apos;t even use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, no good team buffs/rezzes and no friendly-fire abs in Datamine if you are teamed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I say that if you want FFA pvp, you can choose not to team with anyone. If you want team-based pvp, you don&apos;t con red to the people on your team.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Opens up several new possibilities for Datamine, don&apos;t you think?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488847#36300488847</guid>
<link>http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488847#36300488847</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:05:21 GMT</pubDate>
<author>ShiXinFeng</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:Datamine - Free For All *AND* Team Based PvP</title>
<description>Though this is a pretty cool idea, I think Recursion and Syntax would whine&amp;nbsp;about the heavier ganking they would get (they could enter Datamine and get 6v1&apos;d). Plus, with the larger amounts of money you can still make there, I think it should stay as difficult as possible so that it doesn&apos;t get nerfed again.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488857#36300488857</guid>
<link>http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488857#36300488857</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:59:23 GMT</pubDate>
<author>monkeymanx8</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:Datamine - Free For All *AND* Team Based PvP</title>
<description>Datamine is just fine as it is.&amp;nbsp; I don&apos;t see any compelling reason to make this change.&amp;nbsp; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488933#36300488933</guid>
<link>http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488933#36300488933</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:36:03 GMT</pubDate>
<author>Cadsuane</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:Datamine - Free For All *AND* Team Based PvP</title>
<description>say that when you desparately need a res cads :-p</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488945#36300488945</guid>
<link>http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488945#36300488945</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 02:28:57 GMT</pubDate>
<author>7h0r</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:Datamine - Free For All *AND* Team Based PvP</title>
<description>I will.&amp;nbsp; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488948#36300488948</guid>
<link>http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/posts/list.m?topic_id=36300024893&amp;post_id=36300488948#36300488948</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:22:18 GMT</pubDate>
<author>Cadsuane</author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>