Antioch wrote:

Tatranka wrote:

Antioch wrote:

how to interject yourself into a conversation and make idiotic comments

thanks for showing me.

Fail quote edit is fail.

It appears that you have taken the opportunity to prove that you are the eight year old in this conversation.

It wasn't me who interjected into a conversation to troll someone about interjecting into conversations.

Edit: Also, from you defending him I take it this Ahren-K guy is in AT, right? The one outfit in the game that requires all it's members to have MAXes certed, right? And now he's trying to troll some anonymous NC in that tower for using MAXes? Seriously?? You see nothing wrong with that?

Is hypocricy the new cool trend of forumside?

Tatranka wrote:

Antioch wrote:

Tatranka wrote:

Antioch wrote:

how to interject yourself into a conversation and make idiotic comments

thanks for showing me.

Fail quote edit is fail.

It appears that you have taken the opportunity to prove that you are the eight year old in this conversation.

It wasn't me who interjected into a conversation to troll someone about interjecting into conversations.

 

 

Edit: Also, from you defending him I take it this Ahren-K guy is in AT, right? The one outfit in the game that requires all it's members to have MAXes certed, right? And now he's trying to troll some anonymous NC in that tower for using MAXes? Seriously?? You see nothing wrong with that?

 

Is hypocricy the new cool trend of forumside?

You're clearly not paying attention. Calling out hypocracy on others by you is ironic. I was clearly already having a conversation with this chap who brought his ranting tells to us from in game to here on the forums when Ahren jumped into my forum conversation. No trolling on our part just lulz at reminiscing with this person for still ranting about something that happened over a day ago. Now you are providing all kinds of lulz by jumping into the middle makeing one ridiculous comment after another.

Thanks for the laughs, no doubt you're still feeling superior to the rest of us mere mortal forumsiders and you'll provide more.

i love AT, along with PLA the #1 reason to get all them anti-armor/max buster streaks done

PLA Gal dropped a biolab last thursday and went for the spawns, I nearly fell off my chair (sober too).

So.

I hear that almost exact same thing just happened, which caused VS to lose most of our continents. Though it wasnt a drain like in the OP, it was an attack on a continent we had JUST finished getting. And because of wanting to go to Hossin, we lost a more important continent.

I'm also told that a short time later, people on Hossin were complaining about the lack of fight, all the while Cyssor was being attacked.

I see we have learned nothing. There is a difference between starting a new fight when an old one is stalemated, then as a result losing the stalemated fight for a better one, and not responding to a hack on a continent that we just finished claiming, thereby losing hours and hours of work.

I am especially ticked off because I had my guys running repair/ANT duty for every single base on Cyssor for the good of the VS, only to have VS command chat say that the continent wasnt important (even when it was called primary earlier, it was our continent earlier in the day, now all of a sudden we don't care about it)

Especially on CYSSOR, the one benefit that helps us more than ANY other benefit. yeah, an armor bonus isnt that much to a vanguard or a prowler, but our vehicles NEED that boost of hp so we can stand a better chance against the other empire's heavier armor.

Flame away!

Antioch wrote:

You're clearly not paying attention. Calling out hypocracy on others by you is ironic. I was clearly already having a conversation with this chap who brought his ranting tells to us from in game to here on the forums when Ahren jumped into my forum conversation. No trolling on our part just lulz at reminiscing with this person for still ranting about something that happened over a day ago. Now you are providing all kinds of lulz by jumping into the middle makeing one ridiculous comment after another.

Thanks for the laughs, no doubt you're still feeling superior to the rest of us mere mortal forumsiders and you'll provide more.

I don't care what conversation with whom were you having, I was reacting specifically to the posts I quoted.

If you don't like what I write here, feel free to ignore me, I wasn't forcing you to react.

But please do tell me how "Calling out hypocracy on others by me is ironic". Please quote where I say something contradictory or where I blame someone for doing something I do myself too. Otherwise, shut up.

Tatranka wrote:

Antioch wrote:

You're clearly not paying attention....

blah blah blah

I don't care what conversation with whom were you having, I was reacting specifically to the posts I quoted...

blah blah blah

You really are dense. Just because you were selective to when you grabbed a quote in this thread (and we've seen how leet you are at editing quotes) doesn't negate the fact that you jumped into the middle of forumside bantering that had nothing to do with you and proceeded to make broad, stupid, baseless comments and accusations about motives and events you were not involved in nor have any idea of what transpired. All your responses exemplify the fact you have no grasp of what you are talking about.

No one forced YOU to respond with stupid comments and attacks on my fellow outfit member yet you choose to do so and your ignorance and arrogance is like a beacon of light that shines bright on these forums.

That is all.

Why doesn't GotR and AT just merge that way we can have one big cohessive zerg.

BarnesX wrote:

Why doesn't GotR and AT just merge that way we can have one big cohessive zerg.

Firstly, you spelled "cohesive" wrong.

Secondly, "cohesive" and "zerg" in the same phrase seems to be somewhat of an oxymoron. Cohesive suggests as least some sort of organization, while zerg is the unorganized rush of soldiers from point A to point B.

Thirdly, I dont appreciate you coming to our forums and posting an "application". If you intended that to be a joke, you failed.

If you think GOTR and AT are zerg, then you have another thing coming. Because that's the best "zerg" you'll ever find, and the most organized large VS outfits alive at this point. We've been around since the beginning of PS, and I don't think we're going anywhere soon. If you haven't gotten used to us by now, you won't, and you won't like what we do to your bases.

You say you'd like GOTR and AT to merge....that's actually something you should pray never happens. What happens when you get Francko, myself, all of GOTR's old veterans, all of AT's old veterans, all of the CR5s from both outfits, running together constantly? You don't want to fight that outfit.

The difference between GotR and AT...

GotR used to be good.

AT has always been terrible.

robo wrote:

BarnesX wrote:

Why doesn't GotR and AT just merge that way we can have one big cohessive zerg.

Firstly, you spelled "cohesive" wrong.

Secondly, "cohesive" and "zerg" in the same phrase seems to be somewhat of an oxymoron. Cohesive suggests as least some sort of organization, while zerg is the unorganized rush of soldiers from point A to point B.

Thirdly, I dont appreciate you coming to our forums and posting an "application". If you intended that to be a joke, you failed.

If you think GOTR and AT are zerg, then you have another thing coming. Because that's the best "zerg" you'll ever find, and the most organized large VS outfits alive at this point. We've been around since the beginning of PS, and I don't think we're going anywhere soon. If you haven't gotten used to us by now, you won't, and you won't like what we do to your bases.

You say you'd like GOTR and AT to merge....that's actually something you should pray never happens. What happens when you get Francko, myself, all of GOTR's old veterans, all of AT's old veterans, all of the CR5s from both outfits, running together constantly? You don't want to fight that outfit.

internet grammar police.I just offered by input you don't have to be so mean.

BarnesX wrote:

robo wrote:

BarnesX wrote:

Why doesn't GotR and AT just merge that way we can have one big cohessive zerg.

Firstly, you spelled "cohesive" wrong.

Secondly, "cohesive" and "zerg" in the same phrase seems to be somewhat of an oxymoron. Cohesive suggests as least some sort of organization, while zerg is the unorganized rush of soldiers from point A to point B.

Thirdly, I dont appreciate you coming to our forums and posting an "application". If you intended that to be a joke, you failed.

If you think GOTR and AT are zerg, then you have another thing coming. Because that's the best "zerg" you'll ever find, and the most organized large VS outfits alive at this point. We've been around since the beginning of PS, and I don't think we're going anywhere soon. If you haven't gotten used to us by now, you won't, and you won't like what we do to your bases.

You say you'd like GOTR and AT to merge....that's actually something you should pray never happens. What happens when you get Francko, myself, all of GOTR's old veterans, all of AT's old veterans, all of the CR5s from both outfits, running together constantly? You don't want to fight that outfit.

internet grammar police.I just offered by input you don't have to be so mean.

Many people in my outfit and as far as I know AT, treat "zerg" as a derogatory term. Which explains my rant above ^^

My apologies if I responded too harshly to an innocent comment.

BarnesX wrote:

Why doesn't GotR and AT just merge that way we can have one big cohessive zerg.

AT and GOTR have a made efforts to coordinate more often by sharing TeamSpeak servers and coordinating re-secures; making Planetside even more fun.  A merge is not likely for a few reasons.  Firstly, both teams can fill a full platoon of active players and coordinated groups of more than 30 players are overkill for most Planetside fights.  Secondly, each team offers their own culture and we would prefer to have more teams like DARK, Delta Triad, and GOTR to assist, not fewer.  Finally, there appears to be a direct relationship with the number of “No Outfit” players and active outfits, which means having fewer active outfits is also detrimental to a faction. 

Continue to look for more coordination but a merge is not likely.  

I'd be doing more resecures if I wasn't finally trying to get CR5.

Checowsky wrote:

I'd be doing more resecures if I wasn't finally trying to get CR5.

Excuses!