hakek wrote:
is this anger for the lack of uneven fights?
Oh no, they're even now...muahahahahaah .
<cough>
here unfortunalty the best are hackers which are not at all, since the only way too win is to hac and cheat
-word
StealthyRanger wrote:
I can't speak for Hena. But I've been told he's good.
some first hand knowledge there?
leising wrote:
here unfortunalty the best are hackers which are not at all, since the only way too win is to hac and cheat -word
what?
Minack wrote:
leising wrote:here unfortunalty the best are hackers which are not at all, since the only way too win is to hac and cheat -wordwhat?
oye my head hurts again!
Please re-word this.......
Roechacca wrote:
Minack wrote:leising wrote:here unfortunalty the best are hackers which are not at all, since the only way too win is to hac and cheat -wordwhat?oye my head hurts again!
Translation: Here (on the forums), the best PVP'ers are hackers. This was sarcastic because they are not hackers at all. They are simply called hackers because some people assume the only way to beat them is to hack and/or cheat.
- agreeing with myself
I took 2 years of Gibberish in college.
Lancer pulled my bounty once. I dont recall it being much of a fight. I do remember him asking if he could try again. So are we talking one on one or in a mob?
I looked through your posts to find your ingame name, guess it is hakek after all.
your name isn't really a rememberable one, give me a tip on what profession you are?
and I don't group hunt.
Baldak wrote:
Roechacca wrote:Minack wrote:leising wrote:here unfortunalty the best are hackers which are not at all, since the only way too win is to hac and cheat -wordwhat?oye my head hurts again!Translation: Here (on the forums), the best PVP'ers are hackers. This was sarcastic because they are not hackers at all. They are simply called hackers because some people assume the only way to beat them is to hack and/or cheat.- agreeing with myselfI took 2 years of Gibberish in college.
I'm glad someone did. I'm not sure when to take someone seriously anymore when they cry "hack!". I assume we're all joking? right?
Baldak wrote:Roechacca wrote:Minack wrote:leising wrote:here unfortunalty the best are hackers which are not at all, since the only way too win is to hac and cheat -wordwhat?oye my head hurts again!Translation: Here (on the forums), the best PVP'ers are hackers. This was sarcastic because they are not hackers at all. They are simply called hackers because some people assume the only way to beat them is to hack and/or cheat.- agreeing with myselfI took 2 years of Gibberish in college.I'm glad someone did. I'm not sure when to take someone seriously anymore when they cry "hack!". I assume we're all joking? right?
If they say hack they're serious. Hax or the less common hac convey a sense of irony.
Roechacca wrote:Baldak wrote:Roechacca wrote:Minack wrote:leising wrote:here unfortunalty the best are hackers which are not at all, since the only way too win is to hac and cheat -wordwhat?oye my head hurts again!Translation: Here (on the forums), the best PVP'ers are hackers. This was sarcastic because they are not hackers at all. They are simply called hackers because some people assume the only way to beat them is to hack and/or cheat.- agreeing with myselfI took 2 years of Gibberish in college.I'm glad someone did. I'm not sure when to take someone seriously anymore when they cry "hack!". I assume we're all joking? right?If they say hack they're serious. Hax or the less common hac convey a sense of irony.
So Leising seriously thinks NWO's hacking. I get it. These are the facts, if your not see'n someone take any damage in a BF, it's a lag issue with SOE's old vs new code. If someones using the LoS areas to their advantage, while a "cheap tactic", SOE again created the problem, not a third party program. Summary, it's not "hacking".
hey lancer im a mando and it was at dant mining. also i wasnt inferring that you weren't a good player just the only name i could really recognize out of the one dudes list that i have actually seen or been in a fight against. also not saying you group hunt either, was asking about pvp groups when i said that. i guess what i was getting at is pretty much anyone can look really good if they are with a good group which is alot more noticable in the battlefields since us imps aren't outnumbered 3 to 1. nothing personal.
ah so on a battlefield your talkin about? not hunting?
no. you tried to hunt me at dant mining. you lost and asked if you could try again. so i said pull my bounty. this is why i was asking if this post was for one on one or group pvp. cause if i can beat you one on one i would imagine there are quite a few toons that can. : )